Code of conduct in the Hua Hin real estate market ?????

Ask here about the pleasures and pitfalls of buying, selling or renting property and real estate in Hua Hin. Building, design and construction topics welcome. Commercial or promotional posts for real estate companies or private properties are forbidden.
Locked
sargeant
Deceased
Deceased
Posts: 4055
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 2:52 pm
Location: Pranburi CITY

Post by sargeant »

PKB thanks for the apology for refering to me being in the business when i aint,it will be very much appreciated when it arrives :shock: :shock:
I am presuming that as i am not a prospective customer or in the business (and only a NUETRAL observer) thats why i wasnt invited :roll: :roll: :roll:

But thats probably my martian paranoia elvis keeps telling me that :shock: :shock: :shock: :D :D :D :D

BB well done for your invite you obviously have a better left jab than me and quicker on your feet :cheers: :cheers: :thumb:
A Greatfull Guest of Thailand
PKBCXKT
Amateur
Amateur
Posts: 37
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 11:22 am

code

Post by PKBCXKT »

Hi everybody,

we have been busy sorting out sevral things and I want to clarify some quieries.

Firstly the meeting on Monday will be held 11 am at Coco 51.

Secondly, many of you were worrying about the involvement of Khun T...
and salad. Very clear statement, they will not be involved, and they are not invited.

Thirdly, Vaughan is right, we only try to push things forward to form a regulatory body, which is to be run by impartial third party persons in the end, and developers and agents only have an input but no executive functions.

Fourthly, I like to propose the agenda for Monday:

- setting the standard for developers to join the "body"

We propose the bare minimum which is
- absolutely clean title, no power of attorneys to act on behalf, no agreement with owner of land when only 10 or whatever % down, must be 100% clean, bankmortgauges accepted if prooven that money is used for development.
- clear company set up and structure, no nominees. Minimum paid up capital required. To be discussed what that should be.
- building permit required

- setting the standards for the agents to join the "body"

We propose bare minimum again which is
- not to list and sell any development not complying to above 3 points.

- To discuss whether at all or to what extent the provincial authorities should or should not be involved.

- To discuss and propose impartial persons to head and run this body

- To hopefully come to a conclusion to at least try to set up such a body


Please comments and suggestions.

pk
clive
Specialist
Specialist
Posts: 177
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 2:02 pm
Location: hua-hin

Post by clive »

Not many developers going to be there then!
PKBCXKT
Amateur
Amateur
Posts: 37
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 11:22 am

Post by PKBCXKT »

Sarge, sorry and your invited as well as anyone who wants to come.
User avatar
Jockey
Banned
Banned
Posts: 2215
Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2003 5:14 pm

Post by Jockey »

:roll: Sounds good to me
PKBCXKT
Amateur
Amateur
Posts: 37
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 11:22 am

Post by PKBCXKT »

Clive, there are many good foreign and thai developers out there who have no problem complying with the bare minimums and can go way beyond that.

pk
clive
Specialist
Specialist
Posts: 177
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 2:02 pm
Location: hua-hin

Post by clive »

PK I will be interested to see them on Monday then.
JW
Rock Star
Rock Star
Posts: 3207
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2005 8:53 pm
Location: hua hin

Post by JW »

Thanks for the clarification PK, hope this moves forward.
User avatar
Super Joe
Rock Star
Rock Star
Posts: 4929
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 1:43 pm

Post by Super Joe »

Thanks for the agenda PK.

One thing that immediately springs out is the 'nominee' issue. Would I be right in thinking almost all Limited Companies set up for foreigners businesses, developer and agent, have nominee shareholders.
That will need to be ironed out on Monday.
Agree about land titles and building permits, the body will have to regularly monitor developers to ensure compliance when new land/houses are introduced by developer.

Thanks
SJ
PKBCXKT
Amateur
Amateur
Posts: 37
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 11:22 am

Post by PKBCXKT »

SJ, yes and sorry, have to clarify what I meant, the main shareholder or 2 or 3 has to be for real, who hold normally 99% of shares.
pk
User avatar
splitlid
Guru
Guru
Posts: 995
Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 9:01 am

Post by splitlid »

PKBCXKT wrote:SJ, yes and sorry, have to clarify what I meant, the main shareholder or 2 or 3 has to be for real, who hold normally 99% of shares.
pk
so only companies with thai investors are allowed?
"All the otters don't understand me"
"We might make you bother"
User avatar
Super Joe
Rock Star
Rock Star
Posts: 4929
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 1:43 pm

Post by Super Joe »

PK, thanks thats very clear.
That will be a big issue to discuss on Monday then as almost all foreign busineses have nominee set up's.

SJ
Last edited by Super Joe on Sat May 31, 2008 11:56 am, edited 1 time in total.
PKBCXKT
Amateur
Amateur
Posts: 37
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 11:22 am

Post by PKBCXKT »

Ok, I know all that company set-up problems, and the way it is done.
All I wanted to say is that there has to be a properly set-up company behind each developer or agent with a sufficient amount of paid up capital to support.
User avatar
splitlid
Guru
Guru
Posts: 995
Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 9:01 am

Post by splitlid »

PKBCXKT wrote:Ok, I know all that company set-up problems, and the way it is done.
All I wanted to say is that there has to be a properly set-up company behind each developer or agent with a sufficient amount of paid up capital to support.
ok got it, so bob the builder who does a project but has no company formed is not allowed in.
that sounds more feasable
:D
"All the otters don't understand me"
"We might make you bother"
clive
Specialist
Specialist
Posts: 177
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 2:02 pm
Location: hua-hin

Post by clive »

PK you seem to be concentrating on finacial matters which are obviously important but just as important is track record, is this to be taken into account?
Locked