I met a lawyer last night that works for a law firm that has offices in Hua Hin and Bangkok. She is British and they also have an American lawyer on staff here (among others). I had a long conversation with her and she seemed to be very good and knowledgeable on Thai laws including property laws. The firm is called Chavalit, Finch, & Partners Ltd.
I have her business card so if you want to contact her p.m. me. I've done no business with them so cannot personally recommend the firm, but as I said, I spent a long time talking with her and she seemed very knowledgeable.
Bangkok lawyer imperative in house purchase?
Re: Bangkok lawyer imperative in house purchase?
My brain is like an Internet browser; 12 tabs are open and 5 of them are not responding, there's a GIF playing in an endless loop,... and where is that annoying music coming from?
-
- Specialist
- Posts: 148
- Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 8:44 pm
Re: Bangkok lawyer imperative in house purchase?
I would never recommend any lawyer myself. Go to your embassy and ask for one. They have a list.
One recommendation though is not to take a lawyer from the town where you're going to buy as they are involved in the local property business.
One recommendation though is not to take a lawyer from the town where you're going to buy as they are involved in the local property business.
Re: Bangkok lawyer imperative in house purchase?
loverboy44 wrote: One recommendation though is not to take a lawyer from the town where you're going to buy as they are involved in the local property business.

In towns like this one the lawyers are entrenched with the land office also so any business makes both of them a tidy packet and leaves the client smarting.
Who is the happier man, he who has braved the storm of life and lived or he who has stayed securely on shore and merely existed? - Hunter S Thompson
Re: Bangkok lawyer imperative in house purchase?
Yes and no in my experience, one that we give all our work to has persuaded us to change clauses that we didn't want to, in favour of their one-time clients. And this would be about 'influencable' lawyers, if the Bangkok one is of the same ilk, then they could be influenced if someone was determined for some reason.loverboy44 wrote:One recommendation though is not to take a lawyer from the town where you're going to buy as they are involved in the local property business.
Just ask the seller if he can recommend a lawyer, then avoid them

The only real charges outside government taxes I've ever seen is the 10k for a usufruct, which has been this amount whether a lawyer is involved or not.Buksida wrote:In towns like this one the lawyers are entrenched with the land office also so any business makes both of them a tidy packet and leaves the client smarting.
Local lawyers develop working relationships with the officials, which can often result in ways around an issue. No reason a Bangkok lawyer couldn't do the same I guess, although I doubt local officials would feel quite as at ease with them.
I'm not suggesting at all a local lawyer is a better option, just giving the other side of the coin so to speak. Generally a Bangkok lawyer would cost more, even if they were half the cost for producing agreements because of the 3-5 visits, not that cost should be the overriding factor.
I guess if you get a competent one with integrity intact then that would be the right choice, whether Thai, Farang, HH, Bangkok or from outer-space (as some of them admirably portrait).
SJ
Re: Bangkok lawyer imperative in house purchase?
I used an ex UK solicitor who lives in HH but works part time for a BK law firm, must be the same one hhfarang noted above
Best of both worlds IMO
Best of both worlds IMO