Korkenzieher wrote:There's a couple of misconceptions steve2. Firstly, the rents of the bars in town are very high. Since 2007 there has been a substantial collapse of western tourism to certain parts of Thailand - whatever TAT says - and nowhere is this more evident than the Sois around Bintabaht. In 2007, most evenings during the high season were pretty busy and you could say that the high season ran pretty solidly from October through to February.
Since 2007, tourism numbers to Thailand are officially higher and Hua Hin is allegedly regularly booked out. However, it is pretty clear to anybody who cares to look, that most of this is due to internal Thai tourism, and increase in Asian visitors in general. What is also pretty clear, is that those new types of tourists don't seem to be attracted by bars and restaurants that are, fundamentally, designed for people with European tastes. The bars remain largely empty and the season ever shorter. The lame apology that passes for high season in Thailand in the last 5 years or so doesn't get under way much before Christmas. While things appear better than they were a couple of years ago - particularly for the restaurants - times are still pretty thin.
Consequently, there simply aren't the people to justify the numbers of bars that need to be funded all year round. To see why, it is worth chatting with certain bar owners, who are willing to be more forth-coming about rents (Thais and more than happy to tell you about a Farang who is being skinned blind, by their estimation...). For anybody who sits on Binta long enough to see the real level of passing trade, 7 days a week, it is pretty clear that for some, if not most, the sums just cannot add up. Even in certain bars which appear to be reasonably busy.
As for your solution - that is just what most people don't want to see - tourists and expats alike - because if the only way to run a bar is by de-facto pimping, then pretty soon there is little to distinguish Hua Hin from Soi Cowboy or Walking Street in Pattaya. If there were more customers in the bars, there would be more girls. But unfortunately putting in more girls and hoping for customer levels to jump as a result is not only putting the cart before the horse, but is likely to hit the bourgeois diversity that makes the place acceptable to the vast majority.
Losses of bars to incidents like the fire is a real shame, because the new building, whatever it is, will have a higher base cost that has to be recovered - and bars just ain't cutting it.
Spot on Korkie - particularly that the sums rarely add up! And any new building(s) which replace Joy/Cheers will of course need to make more money to cover the bigger outlay on the build.
Or will they? We need to think Thai. Assuming that the new build will be a hotel, perhaps with a restaurant, and that it is built and run by the existing owner of the land, who of course sees other small hotels going up all over town and wants in on the act. He has virtually no overheads. I.E no leasehold costs. His building costs are probably much lower than a farang would pay. Similarly fitting the place out. Who knows - the TAT or Tessabahn may even be dishing out grants!
My old landlady on Naebkerhardt built a hotel. Her husband is in the export business in Bangkok, but she originated from HH. They simply wanted a retirement hobby in her home town. Somewhere their friends from Bangkok could come and stay. OK the place makes money, but that isn't the primary concern because they don't really need a profit - they need a showcase. Status.
Re. putting girls in the bars to attract tourists. Yes - it is putting the cart before the horse. But the other issue is that the girls follow the busiest bars. If HH was suddenly flooded with farang tourists the girls would flock there - tipped off by the bush telegraph, or hunted down by astute mamasans. Come low season many would disappear again. It is a situation that farang bar owners have little or no control over.
A sprout is for life - not just for Christmas.