I spent 30 seconds thinking this up so probably flaws...have at it.


EDIT: With some negotiations they could probably talk the airlines into including it in ticket prices. That's exactly what happened to the old 500 Baht airport departure tax.
I certainly hope so, I regularly hire from bike shops and they take no liability for their vehicles I take out my own, but then again who really has any insurance in TOS. I will no longer go on speed boats to island none have insurance. My son was almost killed last year on an elephant ride which went wrong, again no insurance.caller wrote:Still, one good thing to happen if this goes through is that all the motorbike hire places will go out of business!
Several countries had a usual policy to repatriate citizens at a time of civil unrest. During the Suwannapoom occupation several basically said (after a collective 330,000 tourists had to be airlifted out because Thailands internal security apparatus couldn't see fit to recognise that international airspace starts at passport control) that if you go to Thailand and get into this situation again, we won't do it. In effect, it strained the concept of 'civil unrest' as far as these diplomatic repatriation programs are concerned. Additionally, costs for many of the insurance policies for Thai vacations (which most 'regular' tourists are obliged to have, by the way) increased sharply, as the perceived risk increased. France was the most vocal about it, though several countries said 'next time, you are on your own'. We all know from our own experiences that given the economic fears that many already had at that time, choosing to go someplace else was an easy decision to make.Pleng wrote:Have they? All I remember seeing from the British embassies over the last few years are to take extra care when travelling and avoid crowd gatherings.usual suspect wrote:How can Thailand introduce this ruling when at any given time over the last few years many Embassies (including the British Embassy) have given out warnings NOT to travel here..thus making any policy null & void..??
Steve I think you are rather missing the point , the Thai authorities are not complaining about ' health tourism' ( which is in fact a major concern in Britain ) , the issue is the lack of accident insurance. The obvious solution would be to regulate those who hire motor bikes / arrange adventure tours etc and make such insurance an integral part of any contract, wont happen though and we all know why.StevePIraq wrote:Many of us are Brits, Euros, US we would not be happ foir visitors to arrive on our shores and claim medical. Why do visitors expect Thailand to be different.
Anyone visiting another country should have adequate insurance.
Thailand should start buy ensuring all existing foreign residents have adequate insurance
I feel for you with this, my mother had the same, as she got older she had many ailments and some were serious, she was still able to travel but no insurance company would touch her. In situations like this you just have to accept that the time has come to stay at home unless you can afford a major bill of millions of Baht.HHTel wrote:My mother visits me and her grandchildren in Thailand every year. She stays for 3 months. Until she was 80, she always had medical/travel insurance albeit very expensive. The cost was around 600 pounds every visit and she only claimed once which was around 100 pounds. Now she's older, there is no insurance company that will give her travel/medical insurance no matter what the cost!
Is she to abandon her visits to see family etc. bearing in mind that I have paid tens of thousands of UK money into the Thai economy??!!
Things are not always black and white which makes enforcement almost impossible.