charlesh wrote:Well spotted. Given the transient border of Malaysia aka Malaya etc streching way back into the mysteries of time (read Hall's book History of Sth East Asia") and the English meddling with dare I say Palestine and their subsequent blight on the region with the Balfour declaration and in Sth Asia with the Pakistan/India partition etc. etc. they have a lot to answer for as do all other colonial powers.
Rather than debating the historical perspective my assertion is basically sound ie: they are economic refo's and should go through the proper channels. Much the same as we do when we apply to be guests of this country.
If u don't like the way the Thais try to defend their country and their borders given the huge drain on their economy from perhaps millions of refo's from Burma/Laos/Cambodia then perhaps u should not be here (ie make way for others) and as proof of your philanthropic nature open YOUR doors to yet another tide of humanity who will only b too happy to accept your generous offer in the country of your birth.
PS indiginenous Aborigines are known as Kooris!
And yes the Aboriginals who lived in the Melbourne area did SELL their land to John Batman among others.
PPS there is also some debate as to who were the first inhabitants with Tasmanian Kooris being different from mainland tribes a picture further confounded by the LOSS of ancient skeletal remains recovered in the 1930's in NSW which on examination by Anthropologists did not link them to these people(ie Kooris).
But I digress.
It's nice that there are some people out there taking the moral high ground. Maybe ask what the French think of the Nth African exodus to Marseilles and Paris. Recent chats with nother expats including Danes/Swedes also suggest a similar doubt about economic migration from particular sources.
U might also b interested to know that OZ has apparently more nationalities resident than any other country incl the USof A.
PPPS I have just replaced the glass with Polycarbonate ha, ha!
Closer to home Bradford
Charlesh
I think you are missing the point.
The point is that these refugees were cast adrift in an open boat, without the basics needed for survival.
This is 2009 for heavens sake!
No I do not like the way Thailand defends it's borders, why did they not just deport them back to where they came from, instead of condemn them to certain death on the high seas.
That is the humane way to behave!
Yes, they are refugees, but do not have the luxury of "going through the proper channels" that you and I have access to. They are not allowed to leave Burma etc so how can they?
The UK, where I am, has opened it's doors since the early 50's for peoples of other countries and most of them make a big contribution to this country by doing all sorts of work, and in doing so, are not a drain on the economy of this country.
As for the Aboriginals sale of their land to early settlers, I think you will find that for "sale", you must read "Tricked" out of their lands.
I believe that these so called sales, are being questioned in courts across Australia.
There is no debate about who were the first inhabitants of Australia, they were Aboriginals not whites!!!
Just to get in a PS The term Aboriginal is correct, the words Koori, Koorie, Kory, Kuri, Kooli, Koole, all mean Persons or People, and is used by SOME Aboriginals in PARTS of Australia, namely Parts of New South Wales, Victoria, and Tasmania, and only since the EARLY 1960's.
Getting back to the main point, what the Thai authorities did to these refugees goes against all moral and humanitarian codes, and if you support their actions, I for one question your morals.
