
Yes you do, get scanned or walk home.
Certainly I've never heard of a case of an aircraft reversing into mountain!Cést la vie - I hear your odds are increased sat at the rear of the plane!!
Are you sure? I think Ron Paul articulates it well enough...pharvey wrote:End of the day Don - rules are rules (well, unless the bl**dy PC brigade get involved) and if you want to travel, that's what needs to be done. Plain and ****ing simple.
For what its worth, I'm surprised at you Mr.P. This is more CT moronic bullshit. And I know you're not!MrPlum wrote:or allowing attacks to happen (Pearl Harbour)
To slow the heaving of your outraged bosom, I withdraw the 'Pearl Harbour' comment.caller wrote:For what its worth, I'm surprised at you Mr.P. This is more CT moronic bullshit. And I know you're not!MrPlum wrote:or allowing attacks to happen (Pearl Harbour)
So that must mean:There has only been ONE incident, involving another country, in 2009.
You forgot the third option. There wasn't a threat in the first place. Which is why regular FBI 'sting' operations are needed to gin up the 'terrorist' threat, so that paranoid citizens see terrorists under every bed.hhfarang wrote:So that must mean:
1. The heightened security regulations imposed on air travel (especially in the U.S.A.) are working.
or...
2. Most terrorists have seen the error of their ways and now love the U.S. and no longer have any wish to harm us.
So again, MrPlum, are you saying that the list I posted; http://www.huahinafterdark.com/forum/vi ... 89#p192689 were not real... never happened... or were "ginned up" by the FBI?You forgot the third option. There wasn't a threat in the first place. Which is why regular FBI 'sting' operations are needed to gin up the 'terrorist' threat, so that paranoid citizens see terrorists under every bed.